Skip to main content
SaaSLens

Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no extra cost to you. This helps support our work in maintaining this directory.

Activepieces vs Pipedream

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Activepieces and Pipedream.

Last reviewed:
A
Activepieces

Open-source Zapier alternative with visual flow builder.

P
Pipedream

Developer workflow automation with code and APIs

FeatureActivepiecesPipedream
Pricing ModelOpen SourceFreemium
Free TierYesYes
Monthly Cost (Solo)$0$0
Target Audiencesolopreneurs, developersdevelopers, solopreneurs, startups
VerifiedYesNo
Solo-FriendlyYesYes
Open SourceYesNo
Editorial Rating4/54.4/5
CategoriesAutomation, Developer ToolsAutomation, Developer Tools
Key FeaturesVisual flow builder, 200+ integrations, Self-hosted or cloud, TypeScript SDK, Branching & loopsCode-first automation, Visual workflow builder, 2000+ API integrations, Built-in auth management, Event-driven triggers
Free Tier Quality
excellent
excellent

Pricing Breakdown

Activepieces

Community (self-hosted): free, unlimited. Cloud Pro: $5/month (1,000 tasks). Platform: custom (white-label). Enterprise: custom.

Pipedream

Free: 305 invocations/day. Advanced: $29/month (7,350/day). Business: $49/month (14,700/day). Enterprise: custom.

Integration Overlap

Shared Integrations (6)

Google SheetsSlackDiscordAirtableStripeGitHub

Only in Activepieces (4)

GmailNotionHubSpotOpenAI

Only in Pipedream (3)

ShopifyTwilioAny API

Use Case Fit

Activepieces

  • * Self-hosted workflow automation
  • * Custom integration building
  • * Business process automation
  • * Data synchronization between tools
  • * White-label automation platform

Pipedream

  • * API integration and automation
  • * Webhook processing
  • * Data pipeline automation
  • * Developer workflow automation
  • * Custom business logic

Activepieces

Pros

  • + Truly open source (MIT license)
  • + Modern UI
  • + Self-host in minutes with Docker
  • + Custom pieces in TypeScript

Cons

  • - Fewer integrations than Zapier
  • - Younger project
  • - Enterprise features maturing

Pipedream

Pros

  • + Code when you want, no-code when you don't
  • + Most generous free tier in automation
  • + Built-in auth for 2000+ APIs
  • + Real programming languages (not just drag-drop)

Cons

  • - Requires coding knowledge for advanced use
  • - UI can feel cluttered
  • - Free tier has execution limits
  • - Less polished than Zapier for non-devs

Editorial Verdict

Both tools are evenly matched on price. Activepieces excels at self-hosted workflow automation, while Pipedream is stronger for api integration and automation.

SaaSLens Editorial Team

Editorial Team