Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no extra cost to you. This helps support our work in maintaining this directory.
Supabase vs Turso
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Turso.
Last reviewed:
| Feature | Supabase | Turso |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Monthly Cost (Solo) | $0 | $0 |
| Target Audience | solopreneurs, startups, developers | developers, startups |
| Verified | Yes | No |
| Solo-Friendly | Yes | Yes |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Editorial Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Key Features | Full PostgreSQL database, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions, Edge Functions, File storage | Distributed SQLite, Edge replicas worldwide, Embedded replicas in your app, Multi-database per account, Branching for development |
| Free Tier Quality | excellent | excellent |
Pricing Breakdown
Supabase
Free: 500MB database, 1GB storage, 50K MAUs. Pro: $25/month (8GB database, 100GB bandwidth, daily backups). Team: $599/month (SOC 2, priority support). Enterprise: custom.
Turso
Free: 500 databases, 9GB storage, 500M rows read/month. Scaler: $29/month. Enterprise: custom.
Integration Overlap
Shared Integrations (3)
VercelPrismaDrizzle ORM
Only in Supabase (7)
Next.jsReactFlutterSwiftKotlinStripeNetlify
Only in Turso (5)
TypeScript/JavaScript SDKPython SDKRust SDKGo SDKFly.io
Use Case Fit
Supabase
- * Full-stack web application backend
- * Mobile app backend with real-time sync
- * Authentication and user management
- * File storage and image transformations
- * Serverless API development
Turso
- * Edge-first web applications
- * Multi-tenant SaaS databases
- * Low-latency read-heavy applications
- * Per-user or per-project databases
- * Embedded application databases
Supabase
Pros
- + Open source — no vendor lock-in
- + Full PostgreSQL power with a managed experience
- + Generous free tier for side projects
- + Real-time and auth built in from day one
- + Excellent developer documentation
Cons
- - Fewer managed services compared to Firebase
- - Edge Functions still maturing
- - Self-hosting requires significant DevOps knowledge
- - Connection pooling can be tricky at scale
Turso
Pros
- + SQLite simplicity with global distribution
- + Incredibly generous free tier (500 databases)
- + Embedded replicas for zero-latency reads
- + Open-source libSQL foundation
Cons
- - SQLite limitations apply (write throughput)
- - Newer than PostgreSQL providers
- - Some SQL features not supported
- - Vendor lock-in for distribution layer
Editorial Verdict
Both tools are evenly matched on price. Supabase excels at full-stack web application backend, while Turso is stronger for edge-first web applications.
SaaSLens Editorial Team
Editorial Team