Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no extra cost to you. This helps support our work in maintaining this directory.
Supabase vs Upstash
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Upstash.
| Feature | Supabase | Upstash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Monthly Cost (Solo) | $0 | $0 |
| Target Audience | solopreneurs, startups, developers | developers |
| Verified | Yes | No |
| Solo-Friendly | Yes | Yes |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Editorial Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Key Features | Full PostgreSQL database, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions, Edge Functions, File storage | Serverless Redis, Serverless Kafka, QStash message queue, Edge-compatible, REST API access |
| Free Tier Quality | excellent | good |
Pricing Breakdown
Supabase
Free: 500MB database, 1GB storage, 50K MAUs. Pro: $25/month (8GB database, 100GB bandwidth, daily backups). Team: $599/month (SOC 2, priority support). Enterprise: custom.
Upstash
Free: 10K commands/day, 256MB. Pay-as-you-go: $0.2/100K commands. Pro: $280/month (dedicated). Kafka Free: 10K messages/day. QStash Free: 500 messages/day.
Integration Overlap
Shared Integrations (2)
Only in Supabase (8)
Only in Upstash (6)
Use Case Fit
Supabase
- * Full-stack web application backend
- * Mobile app backend with real-time sync
- * Authentication and user management
- * File storage and image transformations
- * Serverless API development
Upstash
- * Serverless caching and sessions
- * Rate limiting for APIs
- * Edge-compatible data storage
- * Message queuing (QStash)
- * Real-time leaderboards and counters
Supabase
Pros
- + Open source — no vendor lock-in
- + Full PostgreSQL power with a managed experience
- + Generous free tier for side projects
- + Real-time and auth built in from day one
- + Excellent developer documentation
Cons
- - Fewer managed services compared to Firebase
- - Edge Functions still maturing
- - Self-hosting requires significant DevOps knowledge
- - Connection pooling can be tricky at scale
Upstash
Pros
- + Generous free tier (10K commands/day)
- + True serverless — scales to zero
- + Works at the edge (Vercel, Cloudflare Workers)
- + REST API means no connection pooling needed
Cons
- - Per-request pricing can add up
- - Redis feature subset (not full Redis)
- - Latency higher than local Redis
- - Limited ecosystem compared to AWS ElastiCache
Editorial Verdict
Supabase takes the lead for solo founders — it offers better value and is explicitly solo-friendly. Upstash may still be the right pick if you need deep Developer Tools features or plan to scale to a larger team.
Sarah Chen
Editor-in-Chief